Russia has warned that the US is adding fuel to the fire with its long-range missile decision.

The Kremlin has reacted against the White House’s decision to allow Ukraine to use US-made long-range missiles for limited strikes inside Russian territory.

decision, Reported by NBC Newsjust two months before the end of the mandate of President Joe Biden, marks a major shift in policy in Washington, who has stepped up US engagement in the Ukraine conflict since Russia launched a wholesale attack in February 2022.

Previously, the Biden administration had limited the deployment of US-made long-range weapons to the Ukrainian battlefield, but it has used US-made high-mobility artillery rocket systems (HIMAR) in cross-border strikes to defend Ukraine. ) had given the green light for its use.

The latest permission is as follows The deployment of North Korean troops Supporting Moscow in the stalemate conflict alongside Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky Eligible over the weekend as “one of the biggest Russian attacks” against his country.

“It is clear that the outgoing administration in Washington intends to take steps to add fuel to the fire and inflame tensions around the conflict,” Kremlin spokesman Dmitry Peskov said earlier Monday, according to Reuters.

“If such a decision was indeed formulated and conveyed to the Kiev government, it is certainly a new round of tension and a new situation in terms of US involvement in the conflict,” he added. Translated by Google Comments This was reported by the official Russian news agency Ria Novosti.

Ukraine relies on Western allies for military and humanitarian aid, including arms supplies — which NATO members have provided mostly for defensive purposes at Ukrainian bases, further escalation of the war and Russian retaliation. Among the concerns. Speaking to reporters on September 12, Kremlin leader Vladimir Putin warned that any NATO country would allow Ukraine to use long-range weapons against targets on Russian soil. A possible decision would amount to direct participation in war.

“The issue is not whether or not to allow the Ukrainian government to attack Russia with these weapons. The issue is whether or not NATO countries are directly involved in military conflict. NATO countries in the Ukraine war-U.S. , the direct participation of European countries – Putin said at the time. According to the Russian state news agency Tass.

Yet analysts at the Institute for the Study of War warn that Washington’s limited authorization may prove insufficient to materially change the battlefield.

“The partial lifting of restrictions on Ukraine’s use of Western-supplied long-range weapons against military targets in Kursk Oblast has not completely deprived Russian forces of their sanctuaries on Russian territory. will go, because hundreds of military objects are located in the Russian border areas within the boundaries of ATACMS.” He said in a noteRegarding the US Long Range Army Tactical Missile System.

He added that “Russian forces will benefit from any partial sanctuary if Western states continue to impose restrictions on Ukraine’s ability to defend itself and if the United States allows Ukraine to enter Russia’s operational and deep rear of the U.S. border.” deliver weapons to all legitimate military targets within – not just Kursk Oblast.”

“The only way to truly stop this terrorism is to eliminate Russia’s ability to attack. And that is absolutely realistic,” Zelenskiy said. said on social media on MondayWithout directly citing US authorization reports. “It’s not just defense; it’s justice — the right way to protect its people. Any country under attack will act in this way to defend its citizens. We need to work with our partners to do the same. The potential for terrorism should be done.”

It remains to be seen whether European countries will follow Washington’s stance on Kiev’s use of its weapons. CNBC has reached out to major Western NATO allies Germany, France and the UK Foreign Office for comment.

Meanwhile, EU foreign ministers are meeting in Brussels on Monday to discuss the Ukraine conflict.

“I have said time and time again that Ukraine should be able to use the weapons that we have provided them, to not only stop the arrow, but also to be able to hit the shooters. And I believe that. That it will be discussed again,” said EU foreign policy chief Josep Borrell.

Such a decision raises questions about whether to support direct strikes on Ukraine’s existing long-range missile arsenal, at a time when NATO is preparing for President-elect Donald Trump’s return to the White House. Ready – who have previously pledged to end the war in Ukraine. Within a day of assuming power, without providing details.

Nevertheless, the U.S. authorization “could mark a paradigm shift in warfare,” Titi Toporinen, a member of the Finnish parliament, told CNBC’s Silvia Amaru on Monday.

“If it’s true … I think we welcome it, we welcome it wholeheartedly. If it’s one thing we regret, it’s that it came so late,” he said. added. “Europe has to stand up now. This is a critical moment. This is definitely a wake-up call for Europe. On the American side, the election of Donald Trump tells us that we have to take responsibility for our own destiny, and If Russia wins in Ukraine, it means that Russia will only continue.