The famous YouTube and Bigg Boss ott Champion Elvish Yadav is again in the spotlight for wrong reasons. This time, he faces a severe violent reaction to express insulting notes about actress and Bigg Boss 18, Chum Darang during the Podcast Conversation. An excerpt went out of the discussion, which sparked widespread anger on social media.
The controversial section of Yadav is characterized by speaking with his colleague Bigg Boss 18, contestant Rajat Dalal. While discussing Chum Darang, YADAV made a non -sensitive comment, saying: “Karan Fair should have been affected by Covid because those in their right mind will be interested in Chum? No one can have such a terrible taste! Even her name himself is inappropriate. .. Chum, you acted in Gangubai Kathiawadi – What a mix!
The notes faced immediate criticism online. Internet users have given his raw words and lack of respect, as many expressed their disappointment in his behavior. A user commented on X (previously Twitter), “A third -class conversation by a bitter individual.
In the face of the reverse reaction, Evysh addressed the controversy in a blog. In recognition of anger, he admitted to deleting the controversial sector of his podcast. Main Bola Ya Nahi, Hatao, MUJHE negative Chaahiye Hi Nahi. (I said something about Chum. Then I thought, whether you said it or not, I just removed it. I do not want any negativity. If anyone feels bad about what I said, I removed this part.)
He also accused the racism emerging from his comment, explaining that his intention was mocking Karan Fair’s taste in women, and not to make any racist hints. “The second thing, Kitne Bewakoof Log Hain Jinko Ye Samajh Mein Nahi Aa Raha. He said that his record Paul Ra Hin Elvish Ni Kovid Paul Dia, so Elfish is associated with Chinese with Choos … Perhaps Karan had served since he lost his sense of taste and smell – and for this reason The reason loves Chumat. ” Elvish added that he does not support or support racist notes in any way.
Despite its clarification, criticism continues to install. Critics argue that mockery of a person’s name, especially on a public platform, is badly reflected in his personality. Meanwhile, supporters claim that his words were removed from the context.