The controversy surrounding the “Got Gotent” comedy in India, with the summons of the National Women’s Committee (NCW) on YouTubes Ranveer GhlahBadia, Samay Raina, and other influencers of a hearing in its office in New Delhi on February 17.
This step comes after YouTube India is removed from the controversial episode of Samay Raina after the orders of the India government. The relevant episode, which also included content creators such as Ashish Chanklani and Apoorva Mukhija, ignited widespread criticism of its prominent jokes.
“These comments, which sparked widespread anger, violate the dignity and respect due to each individual, especially in a society that supports equality and mutual respect. In light of this anxiety, according to the instructions of the NCW Vijaya RAHATKAR president and NCW said in a statement,” It was scheduled to address the controversial observation. Earnings by Got Catent Institutions in India. ”
Maharashtra police filed a case against 30 people, including God, Badia and Rina, after reviewing the show episodes of obscene content. The Maharashtra Cyber section registered the aviation information area, citing “enhancing obscenity and engaging in a clear and vulgar sexual discussion.”
Likewise, the Asam police filed a case against the duo, which reflects the national scope of response. “Everyone has freedom of expression, but our freedom ends when we go beyond the freedom of others.”
In Endor, a local lawyer, Aman Malvia, filed a complaint against God for his comments on the offer. The police confirmed the receipt of the complaint, but they have not reported the first information (FIR) yet.
“No case has been registered,” police said. ” Malvia, along with other lawyers, accused the influencers of the limits of decency, demanding more procedures and a possible prohibition of the offer.
Meanwhile, God, known as Beerbiceps, apologized for the inappropriate comments that were held during the show, after a major violent reaction to social media. Despite the general apology of Lamadia, noting “the end of the ruling”, the issue is still revealing with the intensification of general and legal scrutiny.