Brazilian public prosecutor said on Tuesday that former leader Gear Bolsonaro knew and agreed to a plan to poison him and the current President Luiz Insio Lula da Silva, as part of a coup attempt that would allow him to stay in power.
Paulo Gunnett Prosecutor officially accused Polsonaro and 33 others of participating in a plan to keep Bolsonaro in power after his 2022 election defeat. The alleged plot also included a plan to poison Lula and shoot at the Dead Supreme Court judge Alexander de Morris, the enemy of the former president.
Gunnett wrote on A 272 accusation pages. “The plan was imagined and transferred to the president’s knowledge, and agreed to it.”
In November, the Brazilian Federal Police submitted a 884 -page report with Gonet, which explains the plan. They claim systematic efforts to sow confidence in the electoral system, formulate a decree to provide a legal cover for the plot, and pressure the higher military copper to communicate with the plan and incite riots in the capital.
The Supreme Court will analyze the charges, and if accepted, Bolsonaro will be tried.
Bolsonaro has already denied the allegations
The former leader denied violations.
“I have no concerns about accusations, zero,” Bolsonaro told reporters earlier on Tuesday during a visit to the Senate in Brazilia.
“Did you see the decree of the coup, at any opportunity?” Did not do it, “he said.
Polsonaro’s lawyer did not immediately respond to a request for comment.
In addition to accusing them of participating in a coup, the 34 defendants are accused of participating in an armed criminal organization, trying to cancel the violence of the rule of democratic law, and the damage to violence and the serious threat against the state’s assets, and the deterioration of the included heritage, according to a statement issued by the press office of the public prosecutor .
Gunnett said that the criminal organization he accused “was like a leader [then] The president himself and his colleague in running, General Braga Nito. “
“The actions that were described in our criminal legislation were accepted,” they were accepted, motivated, and the performance of the actions described in our criminal legislation as attacking the existence and independence (branches) of power and democratic rule. “